Wednesday, December 31, 2008

The most important question of 2009 and beyond

Would a majority of the Muslim world rather see an American soldier or an Al Qaeda/Hamas/Hezbollah/etc. Islamic militant die? If the two lives were in their hands and they had to choose one, which would the majority of the Muslim world choose?

Consider this an open thread as well, but you have to answer the question first.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 29, 2008

One more week....

Saturday, December 27, 2008

For Those Of You Who Think Iraq Has Been A Success

Article re: Top Ten Myths About Iraq.  I am tired of hearing how much success has been achieved in Iraq.  Bullshit. The suffering, ethnic cleansing
and very, very tenuous reduction in violence because of the much praised "surge" point to probably the worst move Bush made, and as we know,
he made plenty of horrific decisions, such as ignoring those who pointed out deregulating the markets would lead to a worldwide economic meltdown.
This does not take into account the miserable failure of the reconstruction effort; the millions upon millions bungled in that regard.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Merry Christmas from the family at Political Inaction

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Rick Warren is right.....

He accuses Gays & Lesbians of 'Christophobia' in this video posted on his mega-church's website. I agree 100%. I don't believe Christians are right here, as I think they're cherry picking parts of the bible. Christ either loves all men and women equally, and we were all made in his image, no matter what our lifestyle choices, or Christ was a judgmental prick who chose between different groups and didn't forgive anyone. Those two things can't exist together and Christians are trying to have it both ways. They're being hypocrites within their own faith....not to mention that 50% get divorced. So the whole gay marriage thing is just a trumped up issue politicians and pastors use to whip up gullible Christians into a frenzy. Politicians for votes, and pastors for people to keeping coming to church and tithing. Rick Warren is using you to make money.

But, the gays and lesbians who demonize Christians are doing the exact same thing they accuse the Christians of. It is the same form of intolerance, and all it does is coalesce the Christians around their viewpoint further. You can't cloak yourself in the bill of rights or the constitution, even though you should be able to, because this is a human rights issue. You also cannot force religions to marry you or recognize gay marriage. That is a completely separate battle between securing all the rights available to opposite sex married couples. You need to win rights at the federal and state level first, then you have to attack the religions for their intolerance. But doing both at the same time, because the American public is against gay marriage, is going to be political suicide, even with Obama and Democrats controlling everything. The last thing Democrats need, nor will they risk political capital on, is a gay marriage bill that the religious right uses to take back Congress in two years. They aren't going to do it until gay activists stop arguing against the religious case. Getting rights isn't a religious issue, even if that is where the roadblock comes from. Stop arguing on their terms. Argue on civil rights terms.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fact of the day.....

To completely power the U.S., less land is needed for large solar farms in the Southwest, than for coal fired power plants when you factor in land used for coal mining.

Where is Dick Cheney from? Wyoming. Where are all 10 of the top 10 producing coal mines in the United States according to a 2007 report from the U.S. government? Wyoming.

It is no wonder our energy policy has shifted so dramatically towards coal. The problem with coal is how dirty it is. It is awful for the environment. Make it clean, and we have plenty of energy for years to come.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Another Bush First

Bush pardons, then unpardons, a guy who's father and business partner gave the Republican Party $28,000 this year. The guy admitted to helping people qualify for government loans by lying about their incomes. Historians are saying this has never happened before.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Jesus in India

While you are off over the holidays in honor of Jesus Christ's birth, check out this movie. It is called "Jesus in India", and it posits that Jesus, between the years of 12 and 30 traveled to India along the old Silk trading route for most of that time, and that he survived the crucifixion, fled to India, and is buried in Kashmir, his mother Mary dying along the way and is buried a few hundred miles away. The Vatican dismisses all of this, as well as the Nag Hammadi Library in Egypt, which contains different accounts of Jesus not included in the bible. If you read some of the writings, you can see why the Vatican or early Christians would like to get rid of them. It seems to me to be similar to the split between Sunni and Shia in Islam, a group of early Christians with a different interpretation of Jesus than the one we know today but it just never caught on. I think for Christians, this story seems to say that Jesus traveled to India, and then brought back a message influenced by Hindu and Buddist teachings. Then, when he started preaching his new message, he was deemed a fugative, crucified, and he fled back to India and lived for many years. Very very interesting movie, and a complete rethinking of Jesus.

The most controversial claim is obviously that Jesus survived the crucifixion and traveled back to India where he was accepted. His mother died along the way, and he died and was buried later in Kashmir. The grave, even though it is older than the Muslim religion, has been locked up by the Muslim Kashmiri government and they say it contains a Muslim prophet. The Indians believe it is Jesus, but most are taught in the region that Jesus did travel there for 17 years between the ages of 13 and 29. Apparently there is a body, on a ledge, behind a wall that DNA can be recovered from. A woman had everything set to have DNA removed from the feet of the body, but Muslim militants in Kashmir stopped her. What if you were descended from Jesus?

I don't find the claim that Jesus went to India for 17 years particularly controversial. There is no information on those years in bible, so who knows what he was doing. If there are historical texts in India that say he was studying there, then so be it. I think the hard thing for Christians is that it would mean that Jesus respected other belief systems, and got ideas from them that he then used in his own teachings. I think it devalues Christianity, and could be why those years are left out of the bible. Why not just be Hindus or Buddists if that is where your belief system stems from?

I also wasn't aware that Jews and Muslims don't accept the crucifixion, as they say that if this happened it means that Jesus was a failure and not the messiah, and that the son of God would not be allowed to fail.

All of this stems from a late 1800s work, The unknown life of Jesus, by a Russian who was injured and taken in at a monastary in the Himalaya mountains. READ THIS. While recouperating, he was shown a a work titled "The Life of Saint Issa: Best of the son of men." They call Jesus Issa in Islam and Hindu and Buddist teachings because it means messenger or son of God. So this Russian translates the work, read it here, writes a book on it, and everyone tries to discredit him. Numerous others have seen it at the Hemis monastary, but no one has seen it in 50 years.

If you get a chance to watch this documentary, do so. It is very interesting.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Obama and Lincoln

Monday, December 22, 2008

Merry Christmas Ladies

Wall Street or Al Qaeda?

Jesse Jackson Jr. = F%#CKED

A fundraiser that J cubed talked to about Obama's seat is seeking immunity. Individual D hosted a lunch meeting in which he said he would raise $1 Million if Blagojevich chose Jesse Jackson Jr.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cabinet Games

UPDATED TO REFLECT COMPLETED CABINET: Original post 11/22: Here is a list of the cabinet secretaries present in our government. Also, the cabinet level positions are listed....I have added the rumored Obama picks so far as none have been formally announced..as you can see, he is moving very quickly and will probably have his whole cabinet in place by the time he leaves for Hawaii for their "annual Christmas vacation":
Cabinet Level & Key Positions

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, December 21, 2008

No one as Irish as Barack O'Bama

This is from Jake Tapper:


Obama's great great great uncle is Irish, and these guys are apparently going to play at the inauguration. There apparently isn't the same backlash, yet, that Rick Warren received.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bush Caused the Economic Collapse

The New York Times publishes a report that says Bush's policy initiatives, meant to expand the Republican party's tent, led to the economic collapse and housing crisis.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rahm to be cleared

The Obama team will release their internal report this week showing Rahm Emanuel talked to Blagojevich and his aides and was repeatedly pressured to offer something for Obama's preferred replacement, but always refused.

This confirms what the federal prosecutor said when this whole thing kicked off....that Obama's team did nothing wrong.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Confidence

Take some time to read the Q&A for Time's person of the year with Obama. Very interesting and confidence inspiring stuff. For me, not as much on the substance, as it is on the mere fact that he can speak so expansively on the details of the problems facing this country and how they all tie together.

My sense after reading it is that he sees the current economic crisis as the vehicle to execute many of his campaign promises....energy independence, stimulus, and universal healthcare come to mind.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

PEBO Announces Science Team in Weekly Radio Address

Friday, December 19, 2008

Quick Hitters

[$17.4 Billion] - WSJ - Bush Admin gives auto companies the bailout money they requested
[FORD] - Ford declines the offer
[$350 Billion] - Paulson wants the remaining $350 Billion in TARP funds
[OBAMA & The Gays] - Time - Joe Klein thinks Obama's inclusion of Rick Warren is a good thing, even though he doesn't like Rick Warren. I think liberals are upset that they've won and now don't have anyone to fight, and they're just trying to fill the void because they are now 'the man'.
[RUSSIAN PAIN] - Russia is getting killed by the low price of oil, just like Saudi Arabia. Maybe now trying to flex its military muscle by sending ships to Panama, Venezuela, and Cuba might just not make as much sense. I say kick them when they're down and develop alternative sources immediately.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Morning Whiskey - 12/19/2008 - 35 Days Left

[CABINET] - WaPo - Obama will announce his final cabinet picks today, meaning that his cabinet is in place over a month before he takes office. The final picks are Hilda Solis for Labor Secretary, Ron Kirk for trade representative, and Ray Lahood, a Republican, for transportation secretary.
[FRANKEN] - HuffPost - Al Franken appears on the verge of winning the hotly contested Minnesota senate race.
[OIL SLIDE] - NYTs - Oil fell to $36 a barrel yesterday, prompting many concerns about the world's economy
[BLAGOJEVICH] - ABC - Blagojevich was a bookie paying money to the mob back in the 80s
[EMANUEL] - Sun Times - Rahm Emanuel talked directly to governor Blagojevich about putting Valerie Jarret in Obama's senate seat.This is where the governor learned that Obama wasn't willing to deal, other than giving him appreciation, for choosing her.
[INTELLIGENCE] - Reuters - Obama chooses retired Navy Admiral Dennis Blair as the director of national intelligence

Posting won't be on a regular schedule for the next week. I'll try to stay as up to date as possible, but if you read last night's article, you'll see that we've had a pretty tough run of it the last couple of days. The contributors, and my sporadic posting, should keep things flowing.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Calvin Francis: 11/28/2003 - 12/16/2008

Calvin, a Jack Russell Terrier, was the smartest dog I have ever had the privilege of meeting and owning. I would like to say he was a nice, normal, good dog, but he wasn't able to be. 90% of the time he was a pure nightmare to deal with in terms of all the precautions we took to protect him and others. Even though he was incredibly obedient, physically beautiful, extremely intelligent, and would do anything you wanted on command, he was also a hyper-aggressive, anxious, and troubled dog. He was constantly on guard and never fully relaxed in any situation. He wasn't antsy, he was just always on the look out for some perceived threat, silently worried that if he let his guard down, something would happen to him. He was fear aggressive, prey aggressive, food aggressive, dog aggressive, and people aggressive. He would climb up on your lap or come to your heel, let you pet him while happily wagging his tail and/or licking you, and then tense up, growl, and/or snap at you a moment later. Often times, he tried to do damage, especially to the other dogs. The 10% of him, alert and curious, hunting outside, and happy to be around us, is what we lived for because it was the only time he was normal and truly happy.

For 5 years, he only wanted two things: to be near us as long as he wasn't touched or his space invaded; and to be outside hunting, patrolling, guarding, digging, and climbing trees, all the while searching for intruders or animals to kill. He had no interest in people, or other dogs, other than to do them harm or dominate them on his terms. He had no interest in toys or playing. The way Calvin played with the other dogs was by chasing them, running them down, flipping them over, and pinning them by the neck. Often, many of the dog on dog fights started when the other dog tried to play back the same way. This led to him being the leader of, but completely isolated from his pack. By the last few months, they avoided him as much as possible, with playing being very very sporadic. He was barely domesticated, as close to a wild animal as I have ever seen in a human household, and still capable of showing us rare moments of affection that a normal dog shows its owner on a moment's notice. The hardest part is that Calvin never let himself be part of the family. He never opened himself up and was always aloof and distant. If he would start to play, or when he showed some affection, he would suddenly stop like he was embarrassed by what he was doing, like he didn't want to demean himself by showing he enjoyed it. That was the hardest, because even though he put us through hell, we loved him with all our hearts, but we could not make him want to be loved by us. He was our burden. He was our responsibility. We were supposed to make him normal, but we couldn't. We lived daily for small victories on his terms. Him wagging his tail, playing with us, playing with the other dogs, only to have them shattered when we would hear him growl at another dog, or he would growl at us while being petted. All he ever wanted was to be near us, but he would never let himself truly be a part of the family. Knowing that he needed and wanted to be part of the family, but not being able to unlock or remove whatever inside of him that was preventing him from truly becoming part of the family, was a painful daily struggle for him and us. I always thought that he wanted to be the dog I wanted him to be. That deep down he wanted affection, and wanted to be dependent, and that he wanted to please us, but I could never get him to cross that threshold. The moments he did were brief but wonderful, and it is what kept us going, what kept us believing, what kept us from admitting what we were faced with, that our days with Calvin were spent trying to advert disasters, and that this would never change.

But he never had a chance from the moment he was born. It was in his genes. His mother died in September of 2008. She broke out of her pen, went hunting all day, and when she came back she died from exhaustion. This determination to a fault, and her skittish personality, is what she gave to Calvin. He was reared with 14 other puppies from 3 different litters, and we believe this had a significant impact on locking in his natural aggressive tendencies because he would have had to fight for food and to be left alone in the chaos. This led to a poor socialization early on, but most of his aggressive and dangerous tendencies were ingrained from birth. Numerous times I had situations where had I not intervened he would have likely died because he didn't know when, or care to, stop doing what he was doing. Chasing him 2 miles away from home in sub 20 degree temperatures because he was chasing geese down the river at 3AM. Catching him as he fell out of trees. Digging him out from under sheds or out of rabbit and ground hog holes. Killing the animals that he mortally wounded but couldn't finish off. Disposing of the ones he did kill. Building walls and extra fencing to prevent him from getting at dogs that outweighed him by 100lbs. Installing kick plates in bed rooms because he chewed his way through a 2 inch wooden door. He had an intense determination to hunt and kill, and this bled over into his social behavior.

The night I got him, at 9 weeks old, he growled off all the other dogs, even the adults, at the food bowl at the breeder's, and in spite of that I picked him because he was the most interesting and independent puppy of the lot. He was also so smart he was already paper trained. The first time he bit was at 10 weeks old, when he split open my nose after I put my face near him when he was sleeping in a chair. Over the years, he bit us, our other dogs, and family numerous times, most times when someone just tried to pet him, or when one of the other dogs got near him. Luckily, I was normally the one getting bit, and the few times he did bite my wife or family members, it was never serious enough to justify putting him down, and we were able to prevent him from biting anyone but me or the other dogs for the last 3 years. Then, the last time he bit me was worse than all of them combined. You try to convince yourself that someone else would have cut his life short much sooner, and wouldn't have given him the great life he had, nor the time, patience, understanding, and freedom we gave him. I don't believe anyone would have accepted him for who he was like we did. But this acceptance put him and us in harm's way. Had a police report not been filed, I would have probably kept him until he did serious damage to one of the other dogs, or worse, a child or family member. He was capable of this every second of every day, and we were incredibly lucky that it didn't happen to anyone but me over his 5 years. Looking back, we were gambling with our livelihoods and possibly our freedom because we knew he was dangerous. I forgave him all of his faults, built a family, household, and lifestyle around them, and I forgave him every time he bit or growled. I let him be the dangerous dog he was because I always thought that 'this time he won't growl when I pet him' and 'this time will be different' and 'he can change if I just love him enough'. But he was the same dog when we got him as he was when he left us. The only thing that changed was that he was meaner, older, unhappier, and more dangerous.

Over the years, we have had to restrict his freedom to reduce the 'incidents'. As we analyze his life, it is clear that the more we tried to control him and prevent any further incidents, the more unhappy he became. All he wanted was to be in control every second of the day, and that meant outside hunting or inside in control of the household. If he didn't have those freedoms, he was unhappy, anxious, and on edge. It became a vicious downward spiral, leading to a stressful life he didn't deserve. Finally, he became a legal liability, as the last time he bit me bad enough to send me to the ER, where the police report was filed. It wasn't a question of 'if' he'd bite again, but 'when?', and 'who?', and 'how bad?'. The vets said that drugs and training wouldn't fix him, and they couldn't do anything for him other than dope him up. They recommended putting him down on numerous occasions, before and after the last bite. Nothing would have changed his instant reaction when startled to defend himself by attacking.

Over the last few months, trying to prevent a bite had escalated into putting a muzzle on him when he is around the other dogs. His life had been reduced to being confined in a room for 10 hours a day, followed by wearing a muzzle for the remaining 14, all to prevent him from biting the other dogs or us. We had to increase the very things that made him unhappy and filled him with anxiety - confinement, segregation, and control - and these restrictions were only increased over the years, and would never have been taken away or lessened.

Tuesday, 12/16/2008, after 5 years of worry, fear, and anxiety, I put down a perfectly healthy dog because he was a danger to everyone, and everything, that encountered him, but I still believe I had no right to do it. He was my responsibility, and I failed him because I couldn't change him. Every moment of every day was spent trying to prevent having to end his life because of his actions. But I tried as hard as I could. I gave him as good of a life as I could, loved him unconditionally, and I did everything I could to protect him from himself.

That Tuesday morning, unaware of his fate and with my wife and I looking on, he finished eating, picked up his muzzle, carried it to the child's gate separating him from the rest of the house, and dropped the muzzle on the ground to signal he was ready to be let out of his room. He was ready to control the house again. It was the last brilliant act of an amazing but deeply flawed dog, letting me know he was OK with wearing the muzzle if I would let him live like that. He was willing to put up with all of the restrictions, but unwilling to let them break his need to control every situation, even if they made him unhappy and anxious, and knowing that I could never change this, no matter what structure I gave him, broke my heart.

As I looked for the telephone number to the vet, I flipped a coin to decide. Heads I don't call. Tails I do. First flip, heads. Best 2 out of 3. Second flip, tails. Third flip, heads. Upset the coin wouldn't make the decision for me, I dialed the first three numbers. Out of nowhere he came into the doorway of the kitchen, and just stood there and looked at me....with his muzzle on. He came and sat in front of me and then reared up and put his paws on my knee. As I finished dialing the number, he turned and walked out of the kitchen and went back to his bed. Watching him walk away, thinking to myself he knew what was going on, was extremely hard. I wish I could have stopped dialing. But I couldn't let him live like that. He was a proud dog that had become a prisoner, and as we reflect over the years, it is astounding to what degree his life had once been free and changed to now being completely controlled. We know we gave him a good life and catered to his every need, but regardless of everything we tried, he only got worse over the years. I hope now that he is finally free, free from the anxiety, free from the restriction, and free to do as he pleases, which is all he ever wanted and the only thing that truly made him happy. He was only ever happy on his terms and conditions, any deviation from what he wanted made him miserable.

I am now only left with memories, 'ifs', and a series of regrets and things I would do differently. I regret spanking him, when he growled or bit in the early years, the most, as I think this made him distrust me, and by the time I figured this out, I feel his distrust was ingrained. Getting him neutered at 6 months instead of 2 1/2 years would have also given us a shot at breaking through his aggression. Making my house a one dog house so we could devote all our attention to training him. I regret not knowing what I know now after years of trying to help him. Had I been a more informed owner in the first weeks and months of owning him, he may have had a fighting chance. I regret being afraid of, and not trusting, him from the moment he bit me in the face when he was 10 weeks old. I regret not trusting him, and that he never trusted me enough to let down his guard. It is very sad to think that for 5 years he knew we didn't trust him fully, and I believe this kept him apart from us. I regret not being a better owner, master, trainer, and friend, because if I had, his story wouldn't have ended this way and could have lasted much longer. But I do not regret choosing him that night. I would never change that. Because if someone else chose him, his life would have been much shorter and much worse, and someone and something other than myself could have been hurt much more seriously. But also, I never would have met him, and had this amazing yet tragic experience. I am thankful for the moments when he did let us in. I am thankful for the daily 5-15 minutes of pure affection that he showed my wife and I, where there was never any doubt that he wanted to be, and was happy to be, with us. I am thankful for the times I got to observe him hunting and playing with my other dogs, whom he did get along with most of the time. I am thankful they may have provided him some form of inclusion that he wouldn't have received penned up his entire life with someone else. I am thankful, that even though he scared everyone, there were still many people in his life who loved him and accepted him, each of whom he was immensely happy to see whenever they came to visit. I am thankful for the little things he did that made me smile and laugh. I am thankful that he was there for me in my time of need. I am thankful for the challenge that he was, as it has taught me more about patience, understanding, forgiveness, adversity, strength, and acceptance than anything in my life. In the end, all I tried to be was his friend.

I hope that he is happy, free, hunting, and among friends where ever he is, and as I told him as I held him in my arms, while he peacefully laid in my lap that morning as they injected death into his veins...'I am so sorry.'

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Obama and the gays

Caroline Kennedy

Go big or go home.....

Auto Bankruptcy

Mika Mugged

Morning Joe co-host Mike Brzezinski was mugged for $6 outside of her hotel this morning right before coming on air. The mayor of Washington DC just happened to be scheduled today:

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bill Clinton's Donor List

Bill Clinton has raised $500 million through his foundation over the last decade from many sources that create conflicts of interest for his wife. Expect all of this to come up at her confirmation with much grandstanding for the Republicans and the drive by media.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Morning Whiskey - 12/18/2008 - 36 Days Left

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

The Evening News

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

OBAMA: Man of the year

Obama has been chosen as Time's man of the year. Pretty interesting, while long, article about him titled "Why History Can't Wait".

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Morning Whiskey - 12/17/2008 - 37 Days Left


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

The Evening News

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Letting some 'light' in.....

Political cartoons serve a major function for news junkies: making news light-hearted for a moment.
There's a great site at MSNBC. Click here.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Morning Whiskey - 12/16/2008 - 38 Days Left

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 15, 2008

Tacit support for terrorism is still terrorism

The Arab world is celebrating the man who threw his shoes at Bush. He is their new hero. I'm surprised how much this has split our own country. My assumption was that all of you would be appalled at someone trying to make a fool out of our president, and by extension, us. I don't like, and never have liked Bush, so save your jokes about him needing no help making a fool out of himself. I think he is utterly unqualified to be president on an intellectual level. I also think he is deeply dishonest, incapable of management and leadership, and has continuously sided with the wrong interests in this country. But he is still an American getting assaulted overseas.

He is a symbol of all of us, and even if you, like I, feel he hasn't lived up to our ideals and image, we were all accosted by some journalist in Iraq who couldn't even recognize the simple fact that, because of the man who he threw his shoes at, he was able to throw said shoes. The very fact the guy had the freedom to do what he did and not be shot immediately on sight,
as there were no real journalists or press conferences before we went in, speaks positively of Bush. We gave them the freedom to be the barbarians they're apparently determined to be. For almost 6 years, the Iraqis have chosen to use their new found freedom to settle scores and kill Americans. You may hate him, but that isn't on Bush. The shoe throwing incident has direct ties to the hatred that Al Qaeda, and other terrorist groups hell bent on killing Americans, tap into to find recruits for their 'holy jihad' against the United States of America.

At some point, as an American, you have to be upset that a foreign citizen, a citizen of a country we freed, tried to injure our president, and by extension, us, and the Arab world is absolutely giddy. You have to be upset that they love the fact that this guy threw his shoes, which are symbols of filth in the Arab world, at the leader of the United States of America. So why was he so angry? His reporter colleagues are saying that he focused all his reporting on maimed children, and this upset him greatly. Maimed from us? Or maimed during the civil war run, financed, and caused by Iraqis and their neighboring Muslim countries? Our soldiers aren't bombing markets. Our soldiers aren't putting on suicide vests or planting IEDs, which lead to children being maimed because their fathers, uncles, and older brothers ambush U.S. convoys or kill Iraqis from a rival religious sect in the night, and we roll into their city to prevent them from doing it again.

This much broader reaching implications than a sensationalist journalist seeking fame and noteworthiness by attacking the outgoing American president. Ask yourself this, what if it was Obama's first trip, and this guy was protesting Obama as a symbol of America? If this guy had thrown the shoes at Obama because of what he represents, how would you feel? The point is that he wasn't throwing them at Bush, and come January 21st, they'll be protesting Obama too. He was throwing them at all of America, and what we represent in the Muslim world. It wasn't an attack solely on George Bush the man. It was an attack on America as a whole, and our very image. An attack on all the soldiers, killed or injured in his godforsaken sand box of a country for his right to sit in a room, as a member of a free media, and ask his president questions. An attack on everyone maimed by a bomb his Iranian trained Shiite bretheren from Sadr city planted along a roadside or American convoy route. This journalist represents the ungrateful Iraqi population, too weak to stand up for themselves under Saddam, but willing to use the freedom of speech we gave them to denounce that innocents get killed, which he blames America for, but who his brethren put at risk by taking part in a civil war. Americans are no longer responsible for Iraqi freedom, and haven't been for awhile.

This has broader meaning because of the response he has gotten from the Muslim world as a whole, and what that says about their willingness to tacitly support the people willing, and capable of, killing Americans. They're in love with what this guy did, as they believe he "said a lot of what the Muslim public has on it's mind". So, when you ask yourself how can Al Qaeda exist in the world, this is your answer. The Arab world doesn't care if Americans are injured or killed. They tacitly support it. They feel, and polls taken during the Iraq war bear it out, the killing of Americans is ok because they believe we have it coming to us. Some numbers I remember off the top of my head....over 50% of people in the Muslim world don't believe Muslims had anything to do with 9-11, with the majority of those saying Israel did it.....75% of Iraqis believe it is OK to kill Americans. When a young Muslim straps on a suicide vest and enters a crowded marketplace, the Arab/Muslim media reports on it as a 'martyrdom operation', not as terrorism or a suicide bombing. Is this because the average Arab/Muslim on the street tacitly supports killing Westerners? Why else would the truth about 9-11 be hidden from the Muslim public? Is it because they wouldn't accept it?

The glee over the journalist and his shoes should scare the living shit out of all of us. 65% of Muslims polled support the shot this guy took at America. 65% of 1.1 billion is a lot of potential recruits with a desire to kill and injure Americans. Al Qaeda only needed 19 to bring down the twin towers, attack the Pentagon, and kill 3000. A Pakistani terrorist group based in Kashmir only needed 10 to shut down Mumbai, India last month. Maybe it is unfair to make the leap that those who support what this Iraqi journalist did also support killing Americans, but that isn't the point I am making. The point I am making is that when push comes to shove, do they out the 'freedom fighters', or do they let them exist, fund raise, train, and organize in their neighborhoods? Do they turn a blind eye because they secretly agree with the aims of the 'freedom fighters' going up against the 'great satan', ally of the Jews? That has real consequences for our interests abroad and here at home. It is only going to take a team of 5 guys to detonate a nuclear bomb in one of our cities, but they're going to have to plan and train for years in some distant corner of the Muslim world. It is only going to take a team of 5 guys to release a deadly nerve agent or biological substance in a school, on a plane, or on the subway, but they're going to have to test it on a local animal population and rehearse their tactics in an out of the way town in Egypt, or Saudi Arabia, or Yemen, or Pakistan.

Often times, when the drive by media speaks of terrorism in the Muslim world, they speak of it as an anomoly. They speak of it as something out of the mainstream and that most Muslims view America as a shining beacon on a hill and all that they want is us to return to the country they once loved. Please explain to me where the evidence of American loving Muslims, not living here, but in the greater Muslim world has existed since the Iranian revolution. Chris Matthews asked a question today that I often ponder...."Why is there always a reserve of men waiting around to protest something at a moment's notice in the Muslim world?"....the answer is unemployment, but that unemployment isn't our fault, even though Israel and America, on the Muslim street, are responsible for all ills. We're even responsible, according to bin Laden, for their leaders' poor performance. So a leader can't create jobs? "He is a tool of the Jews and Americans." The response in the Muslim world to this incident is a glimpse into the Muslim mind that blames America for all of its problems. Remember, September 11th was in 2001, not 2003. Muslims have hated us for a long long time before Iraq. The Muslims you hear speaking positively about America are highly educated, and speaking in English, not in the native tongues of potential suicide bombers.

As I stated above, I am not, and never was Bush supporter, and I bought the reasons for war hook, line, and sinker. I can't trust a government that lies to me, but this incident is bigger than Bush and his legacy. It is the about the sentiment, with deep roots in the Muslim world, that directly leads to violence against Americans, either home or abroad. This sentiment is a direct threat to you and I. You may have been against the Iraq war, but our intentions were ultimately good. I would argue they were Obamaesque by thinking we could go into a Muslim country directly in the middle of the Shia and Sunni conflict, with a majority minority(Shia) population which has been ruled for 30 years by a minority majority(Sunni), and have everything work out. That is pie in the sky stuff.

Make no mistake, the Bush Administration lied their way in. They lied about intelligence, ties to Al Qaeda, and weapons of mass destruction. To top all of that off, they didn't prepare for the post war occupation, and fired the only guy who called for a sufficient number of troops to quell the violence in its infancy. But at the end of the day, whether this journalist throwing shoes, or the greater Muslim world likes it, we aren't forcing the Iraqis to kill other Iraqis. We aren't forcing Iran and Syria to send weapons, funding, and expertise into Iraq to destabilize it. These are Muslim nations using their money and influence to covertly keep Iraq from becoming a prosperous nation state. Why? Because if Iraq is a function democracy, the populations of the monarchly ruled Syria and Saudi Arabia, and religiously ruled Iran will start to ask about their right to self determination. The leaders of the other Muslim nations funding the killing of Americans aren't doing it because of principle, or because their backwards book of worship calls for defensive jihad, they are doing it because a functioning democracy in the cradle of civilization means the end of their power. So Iran bombs a Sunni mosque. So Syria or Saudi Arabia help to bomb a police station in the Shiite Sadr city.

You may disagree with the war, but we are not the ones preventing its closure. The Iraqis themselves, and their neighbors interfering, are the systemic problems. 6 years on, they are the reasons the children are dying. 6 years on, they are the reasons this journalist and the greater Muslim world are so upset. We didn't kidnap him, Sunni insurgents, probably from Syria, did. All of this ignores the fact that Iraqis are still better off out from under Saddam's rule, and all of us know it. The biggest problem is the lack of personal responsibility in the Muslim world. Al Sadr, the leader of the Shiite insurgency famously said when the Iraq war really escalated in the beginning that when any Iraqi kills another Iraqi or an American, it is the fault of the Americans because they invaded. Think about that for a second....they are scape-goating all of their acts of terrorism on Americans. When Sadr's bands of militants round up Sunni men in the night, drill holes from the top of their heads down through their chins, insert bolts, attach a nut, and begin to tighten it, it is the fault of the Americans. Al Sadr speaks for millions of Shiites in Iraq. To believe the Daily Kos argument against the war, you have to believe that American soldiers are responsible for these acts of violence. You have to side, logically, with Al Sadr. You have to believe that it is America's fault that Iran is training bombers; that Syria is sending in jihadis to blow themselves up in Shiite markets; and that the brothers, uncles, and nephews of this journalist aren't responsible for their choice of supporting Al Sadr and his retribution killings of Sunnis. So here is what happens.....the journalist's brethren go and round up a few Sunnis and execute them. We roll in and capture the perpetrators in the night. Because they hide at home, among women and children, sometime innocents get killed. Who put those innocents at risk? The American soldiers or the guys killing their fellow Iraqi citizens or giving foreign jihadis refuge?

The American army is trying to prevent the Iraqis, and greater Shiite and Sunni Muslim populations from conducting and all out bloodbath in the streets of Iraq. That is why we are still in Iraq. Our treasure and the blood of our soldiers is being spilled to prevent savages from killing each other. Like Bush or not, Daily Kos has yet to make an argument why it is his fault the Iraqis themselves, and the Muslim world surrounding them, are picking up weapons to kill each other. That is the logic trap the left finds itself in. They're throwing in their lot with the executioners of the Iraqi civil war and the sentiment that funnels recruits to bin Laden. Because this isn't about hating Bush. It is about Muslims who think they have the right to kill Americans. So my question to the Daily Kos crowd is this: Do Muslims have the right to kill our American soldiers in Iraq or Afghanistan, or Americans citizens around the world? Because remember, bin Laden and Al Sadr don't differentiate between the two, and their hatred for America was there long before Bush took office. It didn't start, and it doesn't end with Iraq, so you can't put the hatred that shoe represents, on Bush. It is a symptom of a larger problem, one we didn't cause. One we aren't responsible for.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Caroline Kennedy

David Patterson, New York's governor currently upset with Saturday Night Live because they mocked his blindness, has grown fond of Caroline Kennedy and she is now the clear front runner to take over Hillary's vacated Senate seat. The drive by media is fixated on how the Clintons feel.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

U.S. Attorney asks Obama team to delay releasing details of contact with Blagojevich

Federal authorities asked the Obama team to delay releasing their contacts with Blagojevich and his aides until Dec. 22nd. Obama's team says that their review of the contacts confirms there is/was nothing untoward done by Obama's transition team.

So what does this mean? Probably that the federal prosecutor has his eyes on another person, Jesse Jackson Jr. maybe, and if Obama's team releases their timeline, it may interfere somehow.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Quick Hitters

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Morning Whiskey - 12/15/2008 - 36 Days Left

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, December 14, 2008

The Eric Holder Confirmation

The Republicans apparently smell blood and they are going to fight Obama tooth and nail on the Eric Holder confirmation, and I also believe, the Hillary Clinton confirmation. As for the former, Karl Rove is going to lead the opposition to Eric Holder, so you know it is going to be pointless, petty, but drawn out and contentious.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bush receives the ultimate insult in Iraq on his last trip to the country

President Bush is on his last trip to Iraq as POTUS. At a press conference with Prime Minister Al-Maliki, an angry Iraqi reporter gave Bush a major insult in the Muslim world: throwing his shoe at him. This picture catches only a glimpse of Bush's reaction. The man was dragged out screaming by security. We can all speculate on his punishment.......

Not quite the reception you would expect for a 'liberator' of Iraq.

Video:


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SNL's Weekend Update: Blagojevich's Hair

Just in case you missed the "Really?!" segment on Weekend Update last night, here it is again. It's hilarious. The Fisher Price part cracks me up, even today.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Beats you need......

The two Shinyribs songs are by far the best

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, December 13, 2008

WARNING: Don't 'test' Obama

Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, who is staying on under the Obama administration, says do not test the new President. Also, he gives a quote about pirates that is priceless....."not rocket science.....speed up.....pull up ladders when they approach."

Also in the article is a note about U.S. soldiers staying in Iraqi cities. They will be there to provide services the Iraqis can't provide for themselves.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Other Obama Logos

Friday, December 12, 2008

Beats you need

In an effort to right the ship that is the "Beats you need," I bring you this (I originally planned a much larger selection, but couldn't get the formatting to work so I gave up:
This is in rebuttal to the Megan Elaine edition from the other day because she glaringly missed the best performance at Monterey. Part 1 - Part 2 - This video is part 3:

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Economic Crisis Pushing Countries Into The Arms of Our Enemies

Ecuador is about to default on a coupon payment of $30 Million dollars it owes to bonds it has issued. Doing so throws the country into financial turmoil which prevents it from finding funding in conventional, READ: Banks, ways. So what is it doing? Seeking help from Russia, China, Iran, and Venezuela. What do all these countries have in common? They get up each morning trying to figure out ways to undermine U.S. interests, militarily, financially, and security-wise.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

BUSH to OBAMA: Still the "White" House

The Obamas want to be in Washington DC by January 5th so their little girls can start school on the first day of winter semester. They put in a request to the Bush Administration that they get into the Blair House 10 days earlier than expected, on January 5th. Bush denied the request. The Administration said it was because the house was already being used. Who is more important than Bush's successor?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why the auto bailout failed

Senators on the Hill say 3 words scuttled the whole thing: "end of 2009". This is a reference to the UAW taking pay cuts so they match the pay of the foreign automakers in the U.S. If a line worker in a Honda plant makes $17/hour, that is what the UAW now has to pay. The UAW refused to give up their inflated pay. I'd rather make a few bucks less an hour and have a job than not have a job at all. The union is going to lead to the Big 3 failing.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Al Franken Might Be A Senator

He at least got one step closer today by winning a major victory regarding absentee ballots. He still has an uphill climb, but a ruling against him today would have sealed his fate as an average former comedian and average former politician.

But also, his opponent looks like he is a criminal in a "I see your Blagojevich, Democrats, and raise you Coleman" move by the Republican party. He apparently solicited monetary favors. He never could answer where those suits came from. All this means is that Coleman wins reelection and a Republican is appointed to his seat once Coleman goes to jail. I bet the voters would have liked to know this 6 weeks ago.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Morning Whiskey - 12/12/2008 - 39 Days Left

Please take a look at our latest article on Saudi Arabia being the biggest threat to America

  • [RAHM's ROLE] - Fox News - Rahm, Obama's chief of staff, may have given the governor's office a list of preferred candidates
  • [AUTO BAILOUT] - The White House and Treasury department are set to give the automakers whatever they need to survive. So the bailout bill being killed last night by Senate Republicans was actually a good thing. Now, the money will have to come from the $700 Billion already approved for bailout usage, instead of $14 billion in new money.
  • [ILLINOIS AG] - A leading contender for Obama's senate seat, the Illinois AG, has filed a motion to get Blagojevich out of office. Chances this helps her case for that senate seat? 100%.
  • [$50 Billion] - NYTs - Prominent trader on Wall Street arrested for ponzi scheme
  • [AUTO UNION] - Fox News - The auto unions refused to concede certain terms and conditions, and now they're lashing out at the Republicans. Sorry, UAW, this is on you.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Nemesis: Why Saudi Arabia is the biggest threat to America

Ask yourself who the biggest threat to America is right now? I’m sure you came up with standard responses like Syria, Iran, Russia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Al Queda, and maybe North Korea. I would argue that the country posing the greatest challenges directly to our way of life is Saudi Arabia. To exist, Saudi Arabia has to maintain a precarious balance between the radical Wahhabist beliefs of its founding, which guide public opinion today, and the wider world which needs the vast energy resources beneath the Kingdom’s sand.

Saudi Arabia is a country with no source of wealth other than its oil. Everyone in the kingdom lives off of the vast wealth this oil provides. There are no other industries, opportunities, or sources of income for the Kingdom. Saudi Arabia is ruled by the House of Saud, a family of herders than unified the country almost a century ago using brutal Islamic Wahhabist traditions. This type of Islam is meant to reject all types of modernity and aims to live as the Prophet Mohammed did in the 7th century. This is the type of puritanical Islam is where Al Qaeda’s fanatical Salafism comes from. Saudi Arabia is also the most important country in the Muslim faith as it hosts Mecca and Medina, the two holiest sites in Islam. Millions of Muslims travel to Saudi Arabia each year to complete the Hajj, a pilgrimage to Mecca, the largest annually pilgrimage in the world. It is the duty of each Muslim to complete the Hajj once in their lives. The House of Saud is a house of cards. On one hand, they have to deal with western businesses and use western business practices, technology, and experts to extract and sell their oil. But on the other, they have to maintain strict religious customs and traditions that resist the modernization Saudi Arabia needs to sustain itself financially. It is this balance that leads Saudi Arabia down a path of continuous direct and indirect threats to the United States. The House of Saud, the sprawling royal family that runs the country, has built a country that needs oil to be priced at about $50-$60 a barrel just to break even. That means at this very moment, Saudi Arabia is running a deficit. But the religious leaders of the country, that in turn direct the unemployed young men of the country, do not accept the modernization of the holiest lands in Islam, nor do they accept foreigners in the holy lands.

The world relies heavily on the energy produced by Saudi Arabia, and their national company, Saudi Aramco, makes hundreds of billions each year selling its energy reserves. How the country uses this money, and the possibility of cutting off its energy to the world markets, is the focus of this article. To appease the religious groups, Saudi Arabia must use the vast income generated by its energy resources to fund Muslim charities near and dear to the religious scholars’ hearts. This doesn’t necessarily mean that all terrorism is funded by the Saudi government. But it comes from royals within the Kingdom who are made fabulously wealthy by Saudi Arabia’s energy revenues, which our daily life funds. Famously, as told by Tom Hanks in the true story “Charlie Wilson’s War”, the Saudi Arabia government matched dollar for dollar whatever the United States gave to the religious fighters battling the Soviets in Afghanistan. To maintain the balance of religious tradition, i.e. keep the radicals happy, vs. keep the country viable, i.e. sell its ever depleting energy reserves to the world, the country must keep the radicals at bay. Saudi Arabia does this by contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to Muslim ‘charities’ that eventually lead to acts of terrorism like the recent attacks in Mumbai, India. Generally speaking, the radicals forgive the modernization of the holiest of holy Muslim countries because the Saudis fund jihads in other countries. As I mentioned above, money funneled through Pakistan to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980s built the complex web of madrassas in western Pakistan that Al Qaeda and the Taliban are currently using to find promising recruits for jihad against the West. The madrassas are like university, with Al Qaeda training camps being graduate school, all funded with Saudi oil dollars. They fund Palestinian suicide bombers. They were funding Al Qaeda in Iraq, as well as Sunnis in western Iraq. Radicals all over the world can find a sympathetic Saudi royal to drop them a few hundred grand for their terror operations. The attacks on 9-11 were rumored to only cost $500,000, or just over 3000 barrels of oil at July’s prices. This is the price Saudi Arabia willingly pays for stability within its country, which allows the royals to maintain power, and continue the vicious Saudi cycle.

The price of oil always has an inverse relationship with stability in oil producing regions. As the price rises, the United States economy becomes ever weaker. As the U.S. involves itself in the unstable regions, the United States economy weakens further, or The Saudi Cycle:

  • the higher the price of oil
  • the greater influence & statue Saudi Arabia has in the world
  • the greater the instability(Saudi funded terrorism and mischief)
  • the higher the price of oil
  • the weaker the U.S. superpower becomes
  • the more the U.S. involves itself in the region
  • the greater the instability(Saudi funded terrorism and mischief)
  • the higher the price of oil

The point I am driving at is that not only does Saudi Arabia keep the peace at home by funding Muslim terrorist activities abroad, but they also profit immensely from it, which further stabilizes and entrenches their monarchy, even though many puritans like Osama bin Laden, would like to see them overthrown so their resources can be used to start a new Muslim Caliphate. Saudi Arabia also sees the benefit of weakening the U.S. immensely by raising the price through the activities of radicals they are funding. For example, a series of suicide bombs in Israel? $20 jump in the price of oil. Israel retaliates against Palestine, or Syria, or Egypt, or Lebanon? Another $20 jump in the price of oil. Let me remind you, oil is at $50 a barrel right now, and Saudi Arabia needs $55 a barrel to survive. What happened 2 weeks ago in Mumbai? A Saudi funded organization based in Pakistan sent 10 men via boat and they mowed down 200 people trying to ignite a war between two nuclear armed nations. What is happening in Iraq, where the security situation has dramatically improved over the last year? Shiite and Kurdish markets and restaurants are being bombed. Thursday, 55 people died in a suicide attack being blamed on Al Qaeda in Iraq. What else are we going to see? Are the Saudis hands in it? I know one thing…that the Saudis have a history of funding radical activity, instability in the Muslim world drives oil prices higher, and that the Saudis need the price of a barrel of oil to move higher.

But the long term situation is only worse. The current leader, while all this nonsense is going on, is considered to be the pro-American wing of the royal family, but he is going to die soon, and we will be left with an out the ass rich nation full of fundamentalists, as crazy as Iran’s religious leaders, with billions of dollars to burn, and a significant percentage of the energy produced in the world under its sand. For example, when the current head of the Kingdom collapsed in April of this year, his duties were taken over by his brother, Prince Nayef, who is seen as close to Al Qaeda. Yes, the leading supplier of oil to the modernized world has someone 2nd or 3rd in command characterized as ‘Close to Al Qaeda’ in their government. This man is going to be heading the Saudi Arabia government soon. He has two quotes I love:

“We will cut off the tongues of those who try to change Islam through reform.” And “The Zionists are behind the attacks of 9-11. They perpetrated them in an effort to make Muslims look bad.”

Motherf***er, one of your cousins bankrolled the attacks of September 11th that killed 3000 Americans.

But what is funny/worse? He put his son in charge of combating Al Qaeda within the Kingdom. I guess that isn’t so funny, but it just shows you that the country where bin Laden is from, and where 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9-11 were from, still won’t admit they had anything to do with the attacks of 9-11, or that they fund terrorism through the world with their oil dollars. So he puts his son in charge of ridding the Kingdom of Al Qaeda’s influence? I’m sorry if I don’t believe that ridding their country of Al Qaeda is a high priority for the Saudis. I believe it means the complete opposite, that the Kingdom is allowing Al Qaeda to base themselves there as long as they don’t speak against the House of Saud, which is what got bin Laden kicked out and sent to Sudan in the 90s. Al Qaeda says in their mission statement, they actually have one, that they want to bring down corrupt regimes like the Saudi royal family that exploit Muslim resources, allow infidel influence, and don’t share the resources equitably.

The influence that Saudi Arabia has, and executes, over the world is the greatest threat to this nation. They’ve bankrolled the training of thousands of radicals looking for jihad to right wrongs they perceive against their faith. They fund hatred and violence against our interests to keep themselves rich, and more importantly, in power. With one royal decree, they could cripple our economy by using the oil weapon. Minimizing their influence over our way of life is the number one foreign policy challenge this country faces, which means that energy independence, however we do it, is a must. I'm not saying walk to work, take the bus, or even build train lines. I'm an American. I drive my own car so I don't have to see, ride with, or talk to anyone else. I want us to use the technological and the entrepreneurial brilliance that put us in the position of the world's only superpower and made us the greatest nation on earth, to get ourselves out of this precarious position we find ourselves in because a few backwardsass goat herders turned kings who want to live back in the 7th century find themselves sitting on top of vast quantities of the most precious resource in the world.

Don't tell me I have to change my habits. That's not the change I believe in. Give me a truck that runs on water, on air, on sun, or gets 100 MPG, and I'll by it. The automakers will be bailed out, either with TARP funds, or something will be passed when Obama takes office. This is a time to get MPG concessions. Give me more efficient heating, and I'll buy it. Give me more efficient windows, and I'll buy them. Give me more efficient appliances/electronics, and I'll buy them. Give me affordable and more efficient solar energy, and I'll buy it. Give me solar shingles for my roof, solar paint for my house, batteries, and a connection to the grid, and I'll buy it all. I don't care. Just do whatever you must to get me off the Saudi oil before it is too late. We need to have a plan B, so when that day comes, say Israel goes to war again with Syria, Lebanon, or Egypt, and Saudi Arabia cuts off the supply of oil, we can absorb the shock without missing a beat. Maybe Israel bombs Iran’s nuclear facilities, and even though Iran is a Shia menace to Saudi Arabia’s Sunni Kingdom, they may decide to cut production to stand in solidarity. The only thing worse than a Shia to a Sunni is a Jew.

My point is that every single time we fill up our tanks, buy plastic products, and generally go about our normal everyday business, we are funding the insurgencies killing our soldiers and dragging down our country in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is an unsustainable house of cards because Saudi Arabia is starting fires all over the world, be it Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, New York City & Washington DC, or Africa, that we have to, and they know we will, put out, because if we don't, Al Qaeda is coming biological or nuclear next time. My worry is that its the tail wagging the dog, and they're keeping us off balance for some larger purpose. So what is the answer?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,